Anarchaic Solutions

//** This blog requires an open mind and an Inner reflection **//

Why has the idea of a Government been recognized as the most thorough and coherent view of a Society with Idealistic standards? Does it possess enough knowledge to decree laws that are objectively true for all it's members? Does it possess enough revenues to financially guide it's country to a safer haven? Does it execute legislations that are profitable to individuals located in every layer of it's social hierarchy?Who determines the Social Hierarchy of a Society?



The representation of Government is a skewed interpretation of Society that is based upon platonic ideas existent since the conception of western society and it's ideals.A Platonist even to this day believes that the physical world is subjected to a higher world of idealistic standards." By what measure should we weigh the balance of law,weights and other physical,moral quantities except it be given from another world possessing an ideal nature ",he jokingly replies.The idea of an ideal government existing beyond the vices of man was the first inherent flaw conjured up by ancient Greek scholars.Religious texts often hold the same kind of deductive reasoning except this time their is an exchange of dialogue between God and man.Alas!How many times have we seen the wrath of a perfect God been unleashed upon unrighteous men.Can a government be called idealistic even if it consists of a group of men who by virtue of being men are subjected to performing gross acts of injustice.Is the Constitution so perfect that it has the power to allow as well as withhold the liberty of man? What to wear and what not to wear? What Sexual preference to have and what Sexual preference not to have? To marry and not to marry? In a hedonistic world where choices are determined by a response to an individual's perception of pleasure,the absolute standards of a Constitution are self defeating.Can the autonomy of an individual be restored by a constitution that is in itself self defeating?



No matter what kind of governance is practiced,the hidden agenda of imperialistic dominance can hardly go unnoticed.Since the mid-1960's America has roughly participated in almost every war on the face of the earth,this it has done under the guise of trying to promote democracy.What is startling to notice is that after every war the nation's wealth has increased after a momentary lapse into recession(except for the last two wars) .For example,after the Kuwait war America fell into a marginal recession but recovered sooner and started flourishing even sooner during the Clinton era.The fact remains that all of America's allies have some way or the other benefited American coffers.Imagine Civilization as a cluster of different forms of governments arising from different parts of the globe,all tenaciously working toward the improvement of their own respective boundaries and you get the picture of how void the importance of an individual has become.The individual has become a victim of incarceration,his views have been locked up by the bureaucratic order of his government.The State legislates laws that are beneficial only to a few parts of the society and yet charges exorbitant amount of taxes to those who are least benefited.The order of a government divides the world into territorial boundaries,coercing other nations for it's own benefits and thus preventing humanity from rising above it's distinctions.


Is America to be blamed for the global economic downturn in recent times or the ideology of a Government? Who determines the flux of money?Who regulates the flow of money in stock markets? Is an Initial public offering necessary for generating better growth? Is Investing the right option? Why does the system fail when stocks fall ?

When the flux of money depends on variables such as borrowing and selling at a magnitude that is strikingly high,should governments impose regulations to prevent dirty play? Should the dynamics of money involve government legislations or is it better for the two parties to resolve differences on their own?Is an independent government judiciary system required for meting out justice? Should the public be offered an IPO at the risk of their own money?

Fifteen years ago when Dr Manmohan Singh freed the Indian markets,it was met by sheer enthusiasm within the industrialist community but with hysterical cries amongst the communist party members.After the recent slack performance at the markets,Dr Singh is condemned as a tyrant by the Leftists,for 'wagging his tail' at American Investors.Can difference of opinion exist among the governing bodies themselves? Was the outcome of ideal governance meant to bring inner conflicts? Do we require a Government?
OR....(WATCH BELOW)



































"IS ANARCHY THE ONLY SOLUTION ?"